Author: Mumtaj Peer Mohammed (a*) &(a) , Aysha (a) and Dhamotharan(b) - 10/08/13, 11:56
More docking results of Mumtaj Peer Mohammed (a*) &(a) , Aysha (a) and Dhamotharan(b)
Address: (a*)Corresponding author, (a) Heads of Departments of Bioinformatics & Microbiology, Mohamed Sathak College of Arts & Science, Chennai - 600 119, India.(b) Associate Professor, Department of Plant Biotechnology, Presidency College, Chennai - 600 005, India
Result table
Rank | Est. Free Energy of Binding | Est. Inhibition Constant, Ki | vdW + Hbond + desolv Energy | Electrostatic Energy | Total Intermolec. Energy | Frequency |
1 | -4.95 kcal/mol | 236.43 uM | -5.75 kcal/mol | -0.44 kcal/mol | -6.19 kcal/mol | 70 |
Interaction Table
polar | other |
O1 (16) [3.68] | – | THR235 (OG1) | | C11 (11) [3.20] | – | SER70 (CB, OG) | |
O2 (18) [3.87] | – | THR235 (OG1) | | C12 (12) [2.96] | – | SER70 (CB, OG) | |
O2 (18) [3.89] | – | ARG276 (NH1) | | C13 (13) [3.19] | – | SER70 (CB, OG) | |
| | C14 (14) [3.54] | – | SER70 (OG) | |
| | C15 (15) [3.49] | – | SER70 (OG) | |
| | C10 (10) [3.05] | – | SER130 (CB, OG) | |
| | C11 (11) [3.32] | – | SER130 (OG) | |
| | C12 (12) [3.15] | – | SER130 (OG) | |
| | C15 (15) [3.16] | – | ASN132 (CG, ND2, OD1) | |
| | O1 (16) [3.74] | – | THR216 (CB) | |
| | C16 (17) [3.75] | – | THR216 (CB) | |
| | O2 (18) [3.24] | – | THR216 (CB) | |
| | C10 (10) [3.60] | – | LYS234 (NZ) | |
| | C9 (9) [2.78] | – | THR235 (CB, OG1) | |
| | C8 (8) [3.89] | – | THR235 (OG1) | |
| | C10 (10) [3.03] | – | THR235 (OG1) | |
| | C2 (2) [3.41] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C3 (3) [3.27] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C4 (4) [2.94] | – | SER237 (CB) | |
| | C5 (5) [3.74] | – | SER237 (CB) | |
| | C6 (6) [3.56] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C7 (7) [3.33] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C8 (8) [2.81] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C11 (11) [3.45] | – | SER237 (OG) | |
| | C12 (12) [3.38] | – | SER237 (OG) | |
| | C13 (13) [2.92] | – | SER237 (OG) | |
| | C4 (4) [3.62] | – | THR244 (CG2, OG1) | |
| | C5 (5) [3.29] | – | THR244 (CG2) | |
| | C3 (3) [3.11] | – | SER274 (CB) | |
| | C4 (4) [3.34] | – | SER274 (CB) | |
| | C5 (5) [3.10] | – | ARG276 (CD, CG) | |
| | C1 (1) [3.66] | – | ARG276 (CD) | |
| | C6 (6) [3.43] | – | ARG276 (CD) | |
| | C18 (20) [3.52] | – | ARG276 (NH1) | |

Docking calculations were carried out using DockingServer (
Bikadi, Hazai, 2009). The MMFF94 force field (
Halgren, 1998) was used for energy minimization of ligand molecule (
From Corina 7941) using DockingServer. PM6 semiempirical charges calcuted by MOPAC2009 (
J. P. Stewart, Computer code MOPAC2009, Stewart Computational Chemistry, 2009) were added to the ligand atoms. Non-polar hydrogen atoms were merged, and rotatable bonds were defined.
Docking calculations were carried out on
CTX -M protein model. Essential hydrogen atoms, Kollman united atom type charges, and solvation parameters were added with the aid of AutoDock tools (
Morris, Goodsell et al., 1998). Affinity (grid) maps of 20×20×20 Å grid points and 0.375 Å spacing were generated using the Autogrid program (
Morris, Goodsell et al., 1998). AutoDock parameter set- and distance-dependent dielectric functions were used in the calculation of the van der Waals and the electrostatic terms, respectively.
Docking simulations were performed using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) and the Solis & Wets local search method (
Solis and Wets, 1981). Initial position, orientation, and torsions of the ligand molecules were set randomly. Each docking experiment was derived from 10 different runs that were set to terminate after a maximum of 250000 energy evaluations. The population size was set to 150. During the search, a translational step of 0.2 Å, and quaternion and torsion steps of 5 were applied.
Result table
Rank | Est. Free Energy of Binding | Est. Inhibition Constant, Ki | vdW + Hbond + desolv Energy | Electrostatic Energy | Total Intermolec. Energy | Frequency |
1 | -4.95 kcal/mol | 236.43 uM | -5.75 kcal/mol | -0.44 kcal/mol | -6.19 kcal/mol | 70 |
Interaction Table
polar | other |
O1 (16) [3.68] | – | THR235 (OG1) | | C11 (11) [3.20] | – | SER70 (CB, OG) | |
O2 (18) [3.87] | – | THR235 (OG1) | | C12 (12) [2.96] | – | SER70 (CB, OG) | |
O2 (18) [3.89] | – | ARG276 (NH1) | | C13 (13) [3.19] | – | SER70 (CB, OG) | |
| | C14 (14) [3.54] | – | SER70 (OG) | |
| | C15 (15) [3.49] | – | SER70 (OG) | |
| | C10 (10) [3.05] | – | SER130 (CB, OG) | |
| | C11 (11) [3.32] | – | SER130 (OG) | |
| | C12 (12) [3.15] | – | SER130 (OG) | |
| | C15 (15) [3.16] | – | ASN132 (CG, ND2, OD1) | |
| | O1 (16) [3.74] | – | THR216 (CB) | |
| | C16 (17) [3.75] | – | THR216 (CB) | |
| | O2 (18) [3.24] | – | THR216 (CB) | |
| | C10 (10) [3.60] | – | LYS234 (NZ) | |
| | C9 (9) [2.78] | – | THR235 (CB, OG1) | |
| | C8 (8) [3.89] | – | THR235 (OG1) | |
| | C10 (10) [3.03] | – | THR235 (OG1) | |
| | C2 (2) [3.41] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C3 (3) [3.27] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C4 (4) [2.94] | – | SER237 (CB) | |
| | C5 (5) [3.74] | – | SER237 (CB) | |
| | C6 (6) [3.56] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C7 (7) [3.33] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C8 (8) [2.81] | – | SER237 (CB, OG) | |
| | C11 (11) [3.45] | – | SER237 (OG) | |
| | C12 (12) [3.38] | – | SER237 (OG) | |
| | C13 (13) [2.92] | – | SER237 (OG) | |
| | C4 (4) [3.62] | – | THR244 (CG2, OG1) | |
| | C5 (5) [3.29] | – | THR244 (CG2) | |
| | C3 (3) [3.11] | – | SER274 (CB) | |
| | C4 (4) [3.34] | – | SER274 (CB) | |
| | C5 (5) [3.10] | – | ARG276 (CD, CG) | |
| | C1 (1) [3.66] | – | ARG276 (CD) | |
| | C6 (6) [3.43] | – | ARG276 (CD) | |
| | C18 (20) [3.52] | – | ARG276 (NH1) | |

Docking calculations were carried out using DockingServer (
Bikadi, Hazai, 2009). The MMFF94 force field (
Halgren, 1998) was used for energy minimization of ligand molecule (
From Corina 7941) using DockingServer. PM6 semiempirical charges calcuted by MOPAC2009 (
J. P. Stewart, Computer code MOPAC2009, Stewart Computational Chemistry, 2009) were added to the ligand atoms. Non-polar hydrogen atoms were merged, and rotatable bonds were defined.
Docking calculations were carried out on
CTX -M protein model. Essential hydrogen atoms, Kollman united atom type charges, and solvation parameters were added with the aid of AutoDock tools (
Morris, Goodsell et al., 1998). Affinity (grid) maps of 20×20×20 Å grid points and 0.375 Å spacing were generated using the Autogrid program (
Morris, Goodsell et al., 1998). AutoDock parameter set- and distance-dependent dielectric functions were used in the calculation of the van der Waals and the electrostatic terms, respectively.
Docking simulations were performed using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) and the Solis & Wets local search method (
Solis and Wets, 1981). Initial position, orientation, and torsions of the ligand molecules were set randomly. Each docking experiment was derived from 10 different runs that were set to terminate after a maximum of 250000 energy evaluations. The population size was set to 150. During the search, a translational step of 0.2 Å, and quaternion and torsion steps of 5 were applied.